Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: New Statesman on ukcrypto, 26/4/99


From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 08:38:14 -0400



X-Sender: nbr () popin newcastle ac uk
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 12:53:53 +0100
To: farber () cis upenn edu
From: "Caspar Bowden" <cb () fipr org> (by way of Brian Randell)
Subject: New Statesman on ukcrypto, 26/4/99

Dave:

Here's a message from the UK Crypto mailing list with the URL for, and a
quote from, an interesting New Statesman article that mentions the mailing
list and its impact.

Cheers

Brian

=====.

http://www.newstatesman.co.uk/199904260035.htm

Editors wanted

Internet by Andrew Brown

....(snip)

Yet there is at least one example of a successful political campaign being
organised on a mailing list; and this is the struggle to keep strong
cryptography legal and widely available in this country. The web has played
a part. The Foundation for Information Policy Research maintains a website
at www.fipr.org which acts as a clearing house for all sorts of documents,
including the texts of all the comments and objections submitted to the
latest proposals for legislation. But most of the thought and co-ordination
has been done on ukcrypto, a mailing list, the lowest form of technological
life. There, for the past two years, the civil servants responsible for
policy have actually been available, more or less, to the people who
disagree with them. They have had to justify their actions not to the
public, but to a small group of geographically dispersed experts, who may
consult among each other between rounds. It's a kind of updated version of
Lions v Christians; as in the original game, the audience is on the side of
the lions, but I think the modern version is rather better for society. It's
a way that cyberspace makes it easy to be a constructive asshole. Someone
should enter it for the New Statesman's Internet contest, which the curious
and determined will find on our website.






Current thread: