Re: Possible Mail server compromise ?

["Faas M. Mathiasen" <faas.m.mathiasen () googlemail com>]

On Feb 20, 2008 6:11 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:14:46 EST, Jon Oberheide said:
> > I'm not sure how n.runs implements their system, but our system uses Xen
> > VMs for the detection engines.  When it is determined that a piece of
> > malware has exploited the AV software (through non-whitelisted process
> > spawning, any network activity, or other unexpected system behavior),

> That is, of course, assuming you don't get blue-pilled before you realize that
> it's been exploited.  Running in a VM helps a *lot*, but it does *not*
> guarantee that nothing will get loose (and notice that a clever malware can
> simply redpill detect that it's running in a VM, and do nothing malicious until
> it detects that it's on a real machine - malware has a *long* tradition of
> detecting and evading if it's running under a debugger...
Nope, you have to distinguish between a sandbox (code is run) to an AV
scanner scanning code in a VM,
when the av scanner scans the code, the code is not executed and
cannot decide whether it is inside
a VM =)