Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Bogon IPs traffic only seen by netflow, confined within a VLANonly
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:33:49 -0700
You can clear the NetFlow cache manually, FYI - 'clear ip cache', I believe.
What IOS/platform are you running on the box that's seeing the NetFlow? At what point in the topology is it located?
If the router is running a recent T-train image, there's a feature called 'RITE' which is essentially SPAN for the router - you could connect your tcpdump box there and sniff the traffic to see if the traffic is present.
l2trace should work if you have the actual MAC address of the box(es) in question; but again, that info might be spoofed or mangled.
Again, on what input/output interfaces are you seeing the traffic in NetFlow? Can you paste 'sh ip cache flow' output?
Feel free to contact me 1:1 if that would help. On Apr 11, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Stef wrote:
UPDATE: Thanks to all who replied, and continue(d) with suggestions. We still have not been able to isolate the problem - the attempt is now to shut down one port at a time, and watch netflow to see when it stops (we are waiting for each port for a 2 * cache expiration, so that we do not risk to move past the "guilty" port). No span/monitor session revealed the needed info, either going through each port, entire VLAN, etc. Shutting down ports has an impact on production, though, so it has to be done fast, and coordinated with the end points, so it has been moving slow (thus the lack of a follow-up, lately). We are beyond 66% of the ports, and still have not isolated it, so it may be - in the end - a faulty flow record, as someone already suggested. As far as this latest recommendation - I wish we had the MAC ;) - this whole exercise is an attempt to identify it, after which I am pretty sure "game over"! Stef On 4/11/06, AJ Cochenour <ajc () mytcpip net> wrote:Assuming CatOS on the C4506:1. Issue the following to locate port if host may be directly connected:'sh cam dynamic | include <Questionable Source MAC -- FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF>' 2. If operating within distributedswitch network issue the following (assuming Cisco/Foundry topology):'l2trace <Switch MAC -- FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF> <Questionable Source MAC-- FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF>' to reveal L2 path to device(s) in question.If using IOS on C4506 issue the following to locate port if host may nedirectly connected: 'sh mac-address-table | include <Questionable Source MAC -- FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF>' In the absence of recent CatOS/IOS firmware to support the commands provided TCL scripting would be a viable alernative. Happy hunting AJC ajc () mytcpip netCombining the below from Nicolai with setting up the port in promiscuous mode and running a Network Sniffer tool would give you enough data totrack it down, I would think. - Jean-Raymond Xavier Pierre Scientific Computing and Computing Services Stanford Linear Accelerator Center -----Original Message----- From: Nicolai van der Smagt [mailto:nicolai.vandersmagt () bbned nl] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 2:12 AM To: stefmit () gmail com Cc: incidents () lists securityfocus comSubject: Re: Bogon IPs traffic only seen by netflow, confined within aVLANonly Stef,Why don't you just span the entire VLAN to a machine capable of running tcpdump, use tcpdump -e to find the hardware address of the station(s) sending the traffic, and look up that address in the CAM table of yourswitch? Would be quicker than spanning 1 port at a time.. Kr, Nicolai van der Smagt -----I have a question, that - in case someone has seen this somewhere - may save us a lot of work: our netflow tool has been reporting lots of traffic (100s of MB/day) between some bogon IPs: 0.10.94.27 to a few IPs in the 37.245.0.0/24 network (e..g 37.245.0.64, 37.245.0.18, 37.245.0.14, etc.).The report comes exclusively for one VLAN, from a4506 switch. The IP protocols being reported are not among the well known ones (TCP, UDP, ICMP, etc.), but rather #140 (for the majority of traffic) and #63 (and some other ones). We have tried to reach (ICMP echo, nmap, etc.) those IPs from various stations from the same VLAN, with no success. Monitoring a few ports (span to a probe), at random, have not revealed anyARP traffic for those IPs, either, thus- at this stage - being unable to determine who is responsible for that traffic. The default gateway for all the systems on that VLAN does not see any of this traffic, either - and neither any other systems form that point on, upstream, al the way to the internal interface of the firewall, which makes us think that somehow that odd traffic is really confined to that specific VLAN (thus - probably - some sort of spoofing, combined with systems aware of each other's MAC, thus no need to hit the gateway ...).The next step is to write a script on the switch itself (TCL -probably) or on an external probe, so that we could span/monitor one portat a time, and go through all the ports on all blades from that4506 (4 modules * 48 ports), until the probe hooked up t the destination port will report the traffic we are looking for (as netflow data reports this traffic going on continuously - so it must exist at all times), from one of the ports. Another simpler approach (but unfeasible, unfortunately, in our scenario, due to the need for machines to be up 3 shifts/ day) would be to shut down one system at a time, and watch netflow when it stopsreporting this junk.So ... short of doing one of the above - has anybody seen this before?Do you have an idea of how else we could trace down the perpetrator?
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // 408.527.6376 voice Everything has been said. But nobody listens. -- Roger Shattuck
Current thread:
- RE: Bogon IPs traffic only seen by netflow, confined within a VLANonly Pierre, Jean-Raymond (Apr 10)
- Message not available
- RE: Bogon IPs traffic only seen by netflow, confined within a VLANonly AJ Cochenour (Apr 11)
- Re: Bogon IPs traffic only seen by netflow, confined within a VLANonly Stef (Apr 11)
- Re: Bogon IPs traffic only seen by netflow, confined within a VLANonly Roland Dobbins (Apr 11)
- RE: Bogon IPs traffic only seen by netflow, confined within a VLANonly Jose Nazario (Apr 11)
- RE: Bogon IPs traffic only seen by netflow, confined within a VLANonly AJ Cochenour (Apr 11)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Bogon IPs traffic only seen by netflow, confined within a VLANonly Nyuk Loong Kiw (Apr 11)