Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: SSH probe attack afoot?
From: "Matt Fisher" <mattfisher () comcast net>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:41:18 -0500
I don't even bother tracing stuff like this anymore. Its way too easy to proxy your requests, and I haven't gotten much mileage out of abuse departments in the past . I think this mail list provides a much better response mechanism :) I have a couple single hosts pounding on me than I take more "proactive" measures but in general I'm sitting back and amusing myself at the lame dictionary these folks / things are using. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Knobbe" <frank () knobbe us> To: "Joe Egloff" <joe.egloff () franke com> Cc: <incidents () securityfocus com> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 2:04 PM Subject: Re: SSH probe attack afoot? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 2/7/2005
Current thread:
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot?, (continued)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? j () 65535 com (Feb 08)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Barrie Dempster (Feb 07)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? j lake (Feb 08)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Jeffrey Goldberg (Feb 12)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Stephen J. Smoogen (Feb 12)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Jeffrey Goldberg (Feb 16)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Joe Egloff (Feb 07)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? naverxp (Feb 08)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Tim (Feb 08)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Frank Knobbe (Feb 08)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Matt Fisher (Feb 09)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? naverxp (Feb 08)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Joe Egloff (Feb 08)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Barrie Dempster (Feb 08)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? j () 65535 com (Feb 09)
- Chinese HTTP ACKs David Gillett (Feb 09)
- Re: Chinese HTTP ACKs Frank Knobbe (Feb 09)
- Re: SSH probe attack afoot? Barrie Dempster (Feb 08)