Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: DOS ATTACK

From: Gary Flynn <flynngn () jmu edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:22:46 -0500


I believe it says a lot about the sorry state of the Internet
when all the suggestions to a crime of vandalism or harassment
consist of technical measures and nobody has suggested law
enforcement. Are we all reduced to fiefdoms needing our own
department of defense and without the protection of our
legal system? Where else are such frequent crimes so nonchalantly
expected and dealt with by the victim?

I realize that law enforcement probably has more pressing
problems needing its limited resources but this is getting 
pathetic.

-- 
Gary Flynn
Security Engineer - Technical Services
James Madison University

Please R.U.N.S.A.F.E.
http://www.jmu.edu/computing/runsafe

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management 
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com

Current thread:

DOS ATTACK Hunt, Jim (Oct 28)
- Re: DOS ATTACK james (Oct 28)
  - Re: DOS ATTACK Alex Lambert (Oct 28)
  - RE: DOS ATTACK Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Oct 28)
- Re: DOS ATTACK Hugo van der Kooij (Oct 28)
- Re: DOS ATTACK Blake Girardot (Oct 28)
  - RE: DOS ATTACK Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Oct 29)
- Re: DOS ATTACK Micheal Patterson (Oct 29)
  - Re: DOS ATTACK Gary Flynn (Oct 30)
    - Re: DOS ATTACK Kurt Seifried (Oct 31)
    - Re: DOS ATTACK Jay D. Dyson (Oct 31)
    - Re: DOS ATTACK Gary Flynn (Oct 31)
- Re: DOS ATTACK Richard Archer (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: DOS ATTACK David Vincent (Oct 28)
- RE: DOS ATTACK McCammon, Keith (Oct 28)
- RE: DOS ATTACK Rob Keown (Oct 28)
- RE: DOS ATTACK Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka (Oct 28)
- RE: DOS ATTACK Black, Braden (Oct 29)
  - Re: DOS ATTACK james (Oct 30)

(Thread continues...)