Security Incidents mailing list archives
Scanning. Is it dangerous?
From: KrivickasS () PASTAS KAM LT (Sarunas Krivickas)
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:12:54 +0200
Hi folks, As I see, almost everyone there are worried about some kind of scanning for own subnets, ports, etc. Do you think it is real danger to you system? So if it is true, the scans as a dangerous actions has to be recognized in your risk management and IT security policy. Does the simple scan of your system has the right place in your policy and also is the trigger to initiate actions and rise the alarm? Of course, we are able to recognize DoS or something like that, but almost all incidents there are talking about simple, usual and not dangerous actions. Yes, you have to think about this kind of actions (I do not call it as attack) if your system is totally unprotected. Lets go to discuss a little bit about subject! My question is how the recognized simple scanning is described in your IT security policy and why scanning is so dangerous for you? Regards, Sarunas
Current thread:
- Scanning. Is it dangerous? Sarunas Krivickas (Apr 29)
- Re: Scanning. Is it dangerous? Sebastian (May 01)
- Re: Scanning. Is it dangerous? Roelof Temmingh (May 01)
- DNS Probes Damian Gerow (May 01)
- Re: Scanning. Is it dangerous? John D. Burkett (May 01)
- Re: Scanning. Is it dangerous? Rune Kristian Viken (May 07)
- Re: Scanning. Is it dangerous? Ryan Russell (May 01)
- Re: Scanning. Is it dangerous? jms (May 02)
- Re: Scanning. Is it dangerous? Jose Nazario (May 03)
- Scanning. Is it a consumer right? ethan preston (May 02)
- Re: Scanning. Is it dangerous? jms (May 02)
- Re: Scanning. Is it dangerous? Russell Fulton (May 01)
(Thread continues...)