Honeypots mailing list archives
Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots.
From: Kostas K <acezerocool () yahoo com>
Date: 9 Sep 2003 11:38:48 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20030908133938.70204.qmail () web40905 mail yahoo com> Hi, Raymond I did not exclude the use of both IDS and Honeypot. I just said that using honeypot and especially a LIH alone you can't rely much on it. Furthermore, someone mentioned that a co-operation between a firewall and a LIH is feasible. The answer is simply yes, and it's a lot easier to deploy a LIH at the internal network rather than communicating with the Internet. I believe that a LIH could be deployed at the internal for the following reason: -you can monitor your employees. There is always the capability of installing certain kind of application in Desktops/workstations. But if you install a LIH that will be responsible for the surveillance of what's going outside is a bit risky. Feeding them with false webpages, someday LIH could be exposed. Ok, you could say that the attacker should be an expert but you never know. I agree that we should invest more on IT security, IT is the future if we are not already in the future. The more people on the Internet the more we need to spend for security. Regards, Kostas
Hi Kostas, Why don't we use both IDS and Honeypot together ? As a matter of fact, given the traffic loading and correction of events, would it be more easily for administrator to do the cross-validation with both tools. regards, Raymond. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
--- Kostas K <acezerocool () yahoo com> wrote: In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309072022340.18729-100000 () marge spitzner net> Hi Kostas, Why don't we use both IDS and Honeypot together ? As a matter of fact, given the traffic loading and correction of events, would it be more easily for administrator to do the cross-validation with both tools. regards, Raymond. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Current thread:
- Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 05)
- RE: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. John C. Silvia (Sep 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 06)
- RE: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. John C. Silvia (Sep 06)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 07)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Lance Spitzner (Sep 07)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 08)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. raymond (Sep 08)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Curt Purdy (Sep 08)
- RE: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. John C. Silvia (Sep 08)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. raymond (Sep 08)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 09)