Honeypots mailing list archives

Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots.

From: raymond <ip_raymond () yahoo com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 06:39:38 -0700 (PDT)


--- Kostas K <acezerocool () yahoo com> wrote:
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0309072022340.18729-100000 () marge spitzner net>

Hi Kostas,

Why don't we use both IDS and Honeypot together ? As a
matter of fact, given the traffic loading and
correction of events, would it be more easily for
administrator to do the cross-validation with both
tools.

regards, Raymond.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

Current thread:

Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 05)
- RE: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. John C. Silvia (Sep 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 06)
  - RE: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. John C. Silvia (Sep 06)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 07)
  - Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Lance Spitzner (Sep 07)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 08)
  - Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. raymond (Sep 08)
    - RE: [inbox] Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Curt Purdy (Sep 08)
  - RE: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. John C. Silvia (Sep 08)
- Re: Usefulness of low-interaction honeypots. Kostas K (Sep 09)