funsec mailing list archives

Re: So, did the BBC cross the line?


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:35:12 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:32 PM, David Lodge <dave () cirt net> wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:25:16 -0000, Paul M. Moriarty <pmm () igtc com>
wrote:
It seems like a pretty fine point to say it's ok to create a botnet as
long as one doesn't have criminal intent, don't you think?

It's convoluted, the Computer Misuse Act (CMA) has a lot of ambiguous
clauses which state "with intent", but, on the counter side if you do
anything unauthorised on a computer system you are in breach (irrelevant
of intent). So, my call, as a non-lawyer would be that they've broken the
law and I'd like to see them investigated. Certainly if I did similar
without authorisation I'd expect to be arrested for it.

I'm also curious about whether the ISPs they used to traverse the
Internet for their DDoS will take them on in the civil arena...


For me, at least, that last bit is the real issue -- the transit path
"collateral damage" issues, not the creation of a pseudo-botnet and the
consent of Prevx.

Let's put this in proper perspective.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFJuzP8q1pz9mNUZTMRAuabAJ9gy6mJSvOeotmU4EgxljJ8rg/6FQCgq10h
Lpxx/Vg2H9KLUBraq5fDuQQ=
=vXLv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: