funsec mailing list archives
Re: s00per firewall
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:45:04 -0400
On 7/14/06, C Q <kyle.c.quest () gmail com> wrote:
Nothing really special or new... they didn't even do their research well when it comes to the existing solutions... especially the commercial ones and for the commercial systems they looked at they usually didn't understand how they worked (word "unclear" or "not clear" show up in more than one place) sometimes saying that those products don't have an open API to be integrated within a larger system. Good for them though... They were able to get some money and build a fun toy.
Is that the best method for combating DoS and botnets though? Creating a DB of hosts and logging their patterns of activity? Is their an algorithm of "normal" net activity you can apply to different IP blocks based on who resells them? Do consumer blocks act with a general measure of a certain type of activity? It seems like a promising method IMO -JP<who may have read too much into it> -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- s00per firewall Dude VanWinkle (Jul 14)
- Re: s00per firewall C Q (Jul 14)
- Re: s00per firewall Dude VanWinkle (Jul 14)
- Re: s00per firewall C Q (Jul 14)
- Re: s00per firewall Brian Loe (Jul 15)
- Re: s00per firewall Dude VanWinkle (Jul 15)
- Re: s00per firewall Dude VanWinkle (Jul 14)
- Re: s00per firewall C Q (Jul 14)