Re: University of South Carolina e-Mail CompromisesStudentIDs

[Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>]

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Dude VanWinkle wrote:

> On 4/19/06, Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Justin Polazzo wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > Brian, you are missing the point of the right to bear arms.  The idea
> > > > was that you could overthrow your government when (not if, when) They
> > > > became oppressive.
> > >
> > > So where's the insurrection?  Or is the current regime not "oppressive"?
> > >
> > > > IN MY OPINION, This was the original intent of the founding fathers,
> > > > not that you should blow away fellow citizens
> > >
> > > How can you carry out an armed insurrection *without* that?
> > > ----------------------------\
> > >
> > > You try taking over the US with _any_ kind of weapon,
> >
> > I choose ... ballot machines.
>
>
> What the diebold ones, or the butterfly ballot cards?
 
Diebold - you need to bribe and subvert fewer people.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.