funsec mailing list archives
RE: Database design.
From: Blanchard_Michael () emc com
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:25:43 -0400
"regular" consumer drives are certainly not reliable enough for something of this scope. Drive array manufacturers (not just us, I'm sure others as well) go through great lengths to ensure that the systems will withstand just about anything with a guaranteed zero loss of data. At the risk of sounding like I'm praising the almighty EMC Symmetrix: Heck, take a peek on www.emc.com, I'm sure there is a page that explains our testing of the symmetrix systems (this is our flagship product). They can withstand like a 8.5 earthquake (and have in real life too), temps way down below freezing for weeks on end, temps way above 100deg F for weeks on end. They really are built like tanks, down to the last component.... I'm positive that NetApp, IBM, etc all put their storage systems through similar testing, although I don't think they are all as thorough with their testing. There isn't a consumer IDE or SATA drive that will withstand that kind of torture and not skip a beat. The drive systems is certainly not the place to "penney-pinch" on a project as huge as the one the UK is going to undertake. Michael P. Blanchard Antivirus / Security Engineer, CISSP, GCIH, CCSA-NGX, MCSE Office of Information Security & Risk Management EMC ² Corporation 4400 Computer Dr. Westboro, MA 01580 -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Drsolly Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 5:48 PM To: Blue Boar Cc: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Database design. On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Blue Boar wrote:
Drsolly wrote:300 gb drives cost about $100. You can put four of those in one computer, total cost maybe $600. For 460 terabytes, you'd need some 400 of those, which would cost $240,000.If you don't also need the CPUs in those distributed machines, ala Google, then you probably just lost all of your "savings" to space, power, and cooling.
400 computers at 100 watts per computer, would need 40 kw. Space requirement - you could put it in a double garage. Aircon requirements wouldn't be too bad, you could probably go with 20 kw to augment the natural cooling. Hardware really is cheap. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Database design., (continued)
- Re: Database design. Blue Boar (Jun 06)
- Re: Database design. Drsolly (Jun 06)
- Re: Database design. Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 06)
- Re: Database design. Drsolly (Jun 06)
- Re: Database design. Blue Boar (Jun 06)
- Re: Database design. Drsolly (Jun 06)
- Re: Database design. Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 06)
- Re: Database design. Andrew (Jun 06)
- Re: Database design. Drsolly (Jun 06)
- Re: Database design. Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 06)
- RE: Database design. Blanchard_Michael (Jun 07)
- RE: Database design. Drsolly (Jun 07)
- Re: Database design. Brian Loe (Jun 07)
- Re: Database design. Drsolly (Jun 07)
- Re: Database design. Brian Loe (Jun 07)
- Re: Database design. Drsolly (Jun 07)
- Re: Database design. Brian Loe (Jun 07)
- Re: Database design. Drsolly (Jun 07)
- Re: Database design. Andrew (Jun 07)
- Re: Database design. Drsolly (Jun 07)
- Re: Database design. Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 07)