funsec mailing list archives
Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net?
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:16:24 +1200
der Mouse wrote:
IIRC, certain bits of DECnet (or at least, certain bits of DEC hardware we had implementing critical pieces of our DECnet) would only talk to MACs that started with (one of) the DEC manufacturer prefixes,It's been a while, so I may have this wrong (and it may depend on which DECnet Phase we're talking about), but as I recall, it was actually that DECnet tried to reach a machine at a MAC address derived directly from its DECnet address (the DECnet node number got a fixed set of bits prepended to it). I don't remember exact details, but it was something like node 14:711 (binary 001110 1011000111, hex 3ac7 after regrouping) being assumed to be at 0a:00:00:01:3a:c7, the 0a:00:00:01 part being constant and part of the spec for that phase of DECnet.
That rings way more bells than I thought were still hanging in that particular belfry... Scary! 8-)
Yes, this put them in a part of the MAC address space assigned to DEC, but it didn't depend on having a DEC card, just on having one whose MAC address could be set by software (these days that's all of them, but back in the earlier days it wasn't). ...
BUT that "coincidence" wasn't, and was by design -- originally DEC only conceived of this working across/between their own equipment, no??
... Of course, it also required software that knew how to set the MAC, but that was just part of having a DECnet stack that could handle that interface.
Ahh yes -- the dim dark magic of making almost anything talk to almost anything else "back then"... At times I kinda wish things were still like that -- all this plug'n'play stuff with "everything enabled by default regardless of the security and performance implications" makes every Tom, Dick and Harry really dangerous. Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net?, (continued)
- RE: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 19)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? der Mouse (Mar 19)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Blue Boar (Mar 19)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 20)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? der Mouse (Mar 20)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Blue Boar (Mar 20)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 20)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Jeff Rosowski (Mar 20)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 20)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? der Mouse (Mar 20)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 20)
- Re: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- RE: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Richard M. Smith (Mar 20)
- RE: No Place Left to Hide on Tomorrow's Net? Jeff Rosowski (Mar 20)