funsec mailing list archives
Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public
From: Larry/Spamhaus <lr () spamhaus org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:35:59 +0000
At 10:55 PM 2/20/06 -0500, Dude VanWinkle wrote:
This thread is killed.. please speak kindly of one anothers mothers and tithe regularly that is all,
Killed after my reply? No unkind words from me I don't think...?
-JP P.S. Larry sux
Which "Larry"? As this is a reply to me, I'm to assume the worst? Cheers, Larry @ Spamhaus
On 2/20/06, Larry/Spamhaus <lr () spamhaus org> wrote: > At 09:34 PM 2/20/06 -0500, Larry Seltzer wrote: > > >>So tell me Larry - which statutes, exactly, said it was legal and not > >abusive when the FBI hassled Martin Luther King Jr, and tapped his phones, > >and all that other stuff they did? > >> >So we shouldn't have an FBI? Obviously these things are balancing acts, and> >we've already suggested elsewhere in this thread how outside monitoring is > >possible. > >> > >>You see, Larry, neither a wiretap nor a camera has any moral sense of its> >own. They can't tell if they're being used for illegal purposes. > > > >Wow, that's like really deep dude. And I guess guns don't know who they're > >shooting so police shouldn't have guns. And jails can hold innocent people > >so we shouldn't hold criminals in them either. > > > >This is what your argument sounds like to me. > > You may have to listen to the sounds a bit more and deeper if you wish to > get the argument being made. Your parallels fall apart below the > surface... "deeper" one could say. Police guns do not target, injure or > kill 99.9999999% innocent people. Jails do not hold 99.9999999% innocent > people. Cameras set up to surveil the public do target and hold this %. > > Deep dude. > > > Cheers, > > Larry @ Spamhaus > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. >
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Things you can't take pictures of in public, (continued)
- Things you can't take pictures of in public Richard M. Smith (Feb 20)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 20)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Larry/Spamhaus (Feb 20)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Gary Funck (Feb 20)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Dude VanWinkle (Feb 20)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 20)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Dude VanWinkle (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Larry/Spamhaus (Feb 20)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Dude VanWinkle (Feb 21)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Bruce Ediger (Feb 21)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)
- Re: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Blue Boar (Feb 20)
- Re: When surveillance cameras lie Dude VanWinkle (Feb 20)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why shouldyou worry about it?" Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)