funsec mailing list archives
Re: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:04:42 -0500
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 06:19:59 EST, Larry Seltzer said:
Goodmail is not meant for you. It's meant for bulk mailers. And in any event, I don't know how much trouble it is to implement the system since I haven't tried it myself. You'd probably do better to fix whatever's wrong with your message that's causing AOL to block it :)
The major reason a lot of uproar started was because there are a lot of sites that are *not* strictly bulk mailers, but just due to sheer size have a high message rate to aol.com. Our site participates in the current AOL whitelist scheme, and we get the feedback loop stuff they send. You know what? Our single biggest problem is people who go to the effort of subscribing to a mailing list (and we're talking confirmed opt-in here), and then they plonk the 'spam' button when they get mail from the list. On Tuesday, we had 2,305 outbound connections to AOL, of which only 175 had more than one RCPT TO: on it. Even at a quarter penny per, that's still almost $200/mo in protection money we'd have to pay GoodMail...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail, (continued)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail der Mouse (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- RE: Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- RE: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- RE: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re[6]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Jeff Kell (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard M. Smith (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Gary Funck (Feb 09)
- RE: Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard M. Smith (Feb 09)