Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Security contact @ Gigabyte
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:29:25 -0400
Yeah, the general FD list policy is to reject requests for vendor contacts unless they also include full disclosure of the bug details: https://secwiki.org/w/FD_Moderation#Requests_for_vendor_security_contacts It's not that there is anything wrong with the more limited disclosure and vendor pre-disclosure approaches, but those aren't full disclosure and so probably belong on a different list.
Maybe FunSec (http://lists.linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec) would be a better place to ask for hep finding the contact: Funsec -- Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. Jeff _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Current thread:
- Security contact @ Gigabyte Gustavo Sorondo (Mar 09)
- Re: Security contact @ Gigabyte Mustafa Al-Bassam (Mar 12)
- Re: Security contact @ Gigabyte Andrew Deck (Mar 14)
- Re: Security contact @ Gigabyte Fyodor (Mar 14)
- Re: Security contact @ Gigabyte Gustavo Sorondo (Mar 14)
- Re: Security contact @ Gigabyte Jeffrey Walton (Mar 14)
- Re: Security contact @ Gigabyte Jeffrey Walton (Mar 14)
- Re: Security contact @ Gigabyte Mustafa Al-Bassam (Mar 12)