Re: Absolute Sownage (A concise history of recent Sony hacks)

[Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>]

> if you eliminate 95% of the holes, it may be
> *effectively* secure, simply because it isn't worth the attacker's time to
> fight for the other 5%

wtf?

if someone has working exploit, the probability of breaking is 100% no matter what the constant 95% is claimed to be.

about fighting for 5%: malware like nimbda and code red appear counterexamples - 
i suppose they automatically fought for 100% and got what they could get (quite above your 5%).

-- 
joro

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/