Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate
From: j-f sentier <j.sentiar () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:34:01 -0500
And you ? Please tell me god, i know i'm an inferior human being regarding you, but please tell me 2009/1/22 Avraham Schneider <avri.schneider () gmail com>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:03 AM, j-f sentier <j.sentiar () gmail com> wrote:hey bitch, you're the first to spread propaganda here, then STFU.this mailing list is archived online - it's not difficult to prove you wrong, but you ignore reality so I'm not going to bother (it's too easy for others to do if they really cared) You've got no creditbility here.Why, because you say so? What did you do for computer security lately?2009/1/22 Avraham Schneider <avri.schneider () gmail com>the fact that you express your opinions on a political manner in a comsec mailing list and they happen to be copied from terrorist propaganda (i.e. baseless, ignores reality, full of lies and distortions) And when you are presented with facts that contradict what you said, you shift the argument to baseless character attacks (with your pathetic English). That basically proves you are here to do propaganda - either voluntarily (because you are EVIL) - or because you are paid to do it by evil people/governments (like Iran, who is known to support terrorists). But it does not explain why you expect n3td3v to stop his computer security related discussions (that are not technical, but computer security related), when you don't stop your propaganda that is _completely unrelated to computer security_? On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:38 AM, j-f sentier <j.sentiar () gmail com>wrote:yeah totally, i work for fucking IRAN punk, if i'm agains free israeli bull-shit, and n3tcr4p , then i'm ureleet or Iran propaganda or something EVIL. this prove your closed-mind side which in this case turns in a fucking brown noze. 2009/1/22 andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace () rocketmail com>Remember in the Palestine war thread he accused you for working for Mossad and being paid to post on full-disclosure. Though he propagandas against n3td3v constantly to turn the world against me or something. Maybe its j-f sentier who is paid to be here and propaganda against things. He may not be a terrorist but he uses terrorist like tactics to turn hatred on. j-f sentier's defence will be, 'but 'Ureleet' done it so it must be ok to join in'. If 'Ureleet' told you to jump off a bridge would you do it? Andrew Intelligencer & Founder of n3td3v On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Avraham Schneider <avri.schneider () gmail com> wrote:The fact that he bears the same name as me, does not mean it's me. I don't spam propaganda - I invalidate yours. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:16 AM, j-f sentier <j.sentiar () gmail com>wrote:which propaganda ? you're spamming propaganda everytime you post. But i understand why now : http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1049327.html "The footage also shows an Israeli soldier, believed by the military police to be Corporal Avraham Schneider, picking up stones andparticipatingin the disturbance, instead of preventing it. " Everything is clearer than ever. 2009/1/22 Avraham Schneider <avri.schneider () gmail com>On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM, <A.L.M.Buxey () lboro ac uk> wrote:Hi,I called for John Cartwright to setup a non-technical cybersecuritypolitical full-disclosure mailing list some time ago, nothingwassetup.because he didnt want to - and theres no demand?What are the solutions for splitting up full-disclosure intotechnicaland non-technical conversation unless two seperate mailing listsarecreated?go off and create a yahoo or google mailing list for such drivelI second that. If he wants to have a list for different types of discussions, the best choice is to just open one yourself. As for getting 'traffic' there, I doubt people would stop postinghereand start posting there (as nothing would stop them from posting ithere).and let FD go back to what it was a few years back - readable and useful!FD is un-moderated and as such people can post whatever they want (security related or not). Usually, people would avoid annoying others with non-securityrelatedtopics - but in the case of js-sentiner and co., one can expectsome spam.Sometimes, when they decide to attack others (either withpropaganda, orjust because they are bored) , those attacked have two options -either a)ignore it or b) respond with non-security related posts and defend themselves (or oppose their propaganda). As far as readibility is concerned, that can easily be accomplishedbyeither white or black list filters - i.e. if you only care about acertainvendor's patch notifications, put a filter to get them andblacklist therest; if you care not to get any andrew wallase/avrahamschneider/jssentier/whatever/whoever conversations - set a filter for that -and you areback with a readable FD. Just keep in mind that your posts requesting FD to go back to being readable, are not computer security related either (at leastwithoutwickedly twisting the meaning of the phrase 'computer security'). So for the same reason you find it OK to post your request (and itis),andrew finds it OK to posts his (and it is). Not trying to defend n3td3v or anything - but there's somehypocricyhere.ala _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate, (continued)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate Avraham Schneider (Jan 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate j-f sentier (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate andrew.wallace (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate j-f sentier (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate j-f sentier (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate j-f sentier (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate andrew.wallace (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate Avraham Schneider (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate j-f sentier (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate Avraham Schneider (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate j-f sentier (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate Avraham Schneider (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate andrew.wallace (Jan 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate j-f sentier (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate andrew.wallace (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate Fabio N Sarmento [ Gmail ] (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate Jan G.B. (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate j-f sentier (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate Avraham Schneider (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate andrew.wallace (Jan 22)
- Re: Barack Obama <-- Not Appropriate j-f sentier (Jan 22)