Re: McKinnon a 'scapegoat for Pentagon insecurity'

[n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>]

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:26 PM, James Matthews <nytrokiss () gmail com> wrote:
> It's cheaper for them to scare people away then secure their systems!

How much will it cost to fly him over to U.S, keep him in prison,
watered and fed? Is the U.S not already in a recession, have they
really got the money to ramp up somebody's crime to give a false
impression to the presidency that computer hacking needs to be a
national security agenda for the next administration to worry
about?.... really I don't think hackers are a national security item
for a president to worry about...

All the best,

n3td3v

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/