Re: security industry software license

[Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com>]

On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:47 PM, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
> What's a few million here, a few billion there in the name of national
> security? Money hasn't stopped the Department of Homeland Security
> implement far more stupider things in the past. No, I don't think
> money is the issue here, what the issue here is, is ironing out the
> details to make this whole thing workable and effective, and getting
> cross-government, cross-sector cooperation with rolling the scheme out
> and it be made an industry standard that everyone is agreed upon. That
> is the real challenge that faces us, not how much money its going to
> cost. We can talk about the money later, let's just get the proposal
> details worked out and put on the table first and see if its got a
> chance for any funding.

werent u just the 1 bitching about the government slating 30 million
for security?  but i guess its okay if it's _ur_ idea instead of
congress's idea?

it wont work, next rant.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/