Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: security industry software license
From: "Michael Simpson" <mikie.simpson () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:39:54 +0100
On 10/10/08, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
there should be a central license that people apply for to use software like metasploit.You don't want to go there.let's go there anyway, and if hd moore doesn't comply, we can just slap some sort of law on the license to make it against the law not to require that downloaders have the license.
/snip stuff oh you're awake 1430 start today then not bad anyhoo Would this licence be from the same government that can't manage to work out that someone claiming for 36 new kids in 2 years isn't up to fraud? <http://news.scotsman.com/aberdeen/Man-admits-child--benefit.4009052.jp> Or is unable to enforce proper data protection from one of their preferred consultants? <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7575989.stm> Or the same government that tells the scottish ambulance service that it is ok to send live data to yet another third party company by disc? <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7470006.stm> Or which has lost 6 lappies in the last 12 months? snip Answered by John Swinney (Thursday, August 28, 2008): In relation to core Scottish Government (SG) directorates and close agencies using the SG network, six SG laptops have been lost during the last 12 months. Two of these were unused new machines lost in transit to their intended users by the courier company. /snip Or should the licence be handed out by the local authorities for each region after all they know all about due diligence? <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7662459.stm> after all the whole icelandic banking system was based on one leveraged hedge fund which most financial people wouldn't have touched with a 60' pole That is just the uk/scottish gov. Why should HDM place any trust in governments to be able to decide who should or shouldn't have access to the software he produces? After all, your "largest sec google group" may qualify you to be granted this whitehat ticket that you are so keen on yet any half-hearted search of the archives would patently demonstrate that you are *way* too volatile be allowed axs to anything that could construed as harmful to other users of the intarweb. mike _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 09)
- Re: security industry software license Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 09)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 10)
- Re: security industry software license Michael Simpson (Oct 10)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 10)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 10)
- Re: security industry software license Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 09)
- Re: security industry software license Freeman Y. (Oct 10)
- Re: security industry software license AaRoNg11 (Oct 11)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 11)
- Re: security industry software license Ureleet (Oct 11)
- Re: security industry software license AaRoNg11 (Oct 11)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 11)
- Re: security industry software license Pavel Kankovsky (Oct 12)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 12)
- Re: security industry software license vulcanius (Oct 12)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 12)
- Re: security industry software license n3td3v (Oct 12)