Re: Fwd: Let's outlaw mass securityconferencespamming its f****** gay

[Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com>]

arent we already there?

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Jason <security () brvenik com> wrote:

> We are now close to this space being full circle. The next step is that
> the researchers will offer the vendor a chance to compete for the
> information on the vuln IP market and as a result winning vendors can
> choose to keep it to themselves...
>
> Yep, Microsoft has won and we will soon be back to non-disclosure all
> around.
>
> Micheal Cottingham wrote:
> > I too have participated in ZDI as a researcher. It is a very good
> > program, and both the company and the researcher get what they want
> > out of the process. The company gets the time to fix the vulnerability
> > before everybody else finds out, and the researcher gets the
> > recognition (and some money) for their work. It is a win-win
> > situation.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Ureleet <ureleet () gmail com> wrote:
> > > ive dealt a bit with tipping point and their zdi.  how about you learn
> how
> > > it works first, the come back and criticize it?  you obviously dont
> > > understand the contest at cansecwest, or how zdi plays into it.  i was
> > > there, it was a good conf.
> > >
> > > but you need to learn how it works before you go ranting about it....
> > > again...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/