Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:38:42 -0500
--On Tuesday, September 12, 2006 09:12:14 +0100 c0ntex <c0ntexb () gmail com> wrote:
This is stupid. There's tons of documentation in the public domain that refutes your assertions. Go read the International Chemical Weapons agreements, which clearly state that white phosphorus is *not* defined as a chemical weapon. Given that, nothing else needs to be explained.Good sir, if what you say be true, show me your proof. Also, using your medical training, explain the injuries to the bodies in Falluja.
No one has to prove anything to you. Furthermore, you wouldn't believe it if someone did prove it. You've already asserted that no matter what anyone says about Jesse Macbeth, you'll just excuse it away as manipulation by the evil people of the world. Even his own discharge papers, posted on his own website, showed that he was washed out of boot camp.
Stop wasting our time with this crap. Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Throwaway1 () columbus rr com (Sep 11)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Gary E. Miller (Sep 11)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Paul Schmehl (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Paul Schmehl (Sep 12)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Denis Jedig (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this bkfsec (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 12)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is aptfor this Dave "No, not that one" Korn (Sep 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this b . hines (Sep 12)
- RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Throwaway1 () columbus rr com (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Nick FitzGerald (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this bkfsec (Sep 13)