Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
From: c0ntex <c0ntexb () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:12:14 +0100
Good sir, if what you say be true, show me your proof. Also, using your medical training, explain the injuries to the bodies in Falluja. Thanks :-) On 12/09/06, Throwaway1 () columbus rr com <Throwaway1 () columbus rr com> wrote:
Contex - ........ ==================================== >If you consider that America are >able to lie about the weapons of mass >destruction and then admit it, ==================================== "America" never lied about WMD. America is not in a position to prove that any WMD stockpiles existed past December of 1998, when Saddam kicked out the UN; but at worst that makes them wrong, not liars. ===================================== >use chemical weapons in Iraq and lie >about it and then admit it ===================================== America did not use Nerve Agents or Blister Agents in Iraq. Nerve Agents and Blister Agents are "Chemical Waepons". Smoke Generators and tear gas are not. Unless of course you are seeking to redefine the word to fit a political agenda. ==================================== >On Wikipedia they also discuss the >mans "criminal history", what has >that got to do with anything other >than making the man seem unreliable. ==================================== He IS unrealiable. He is also a fake. His criminal history is part of his backstory. On a personal note, speaking as someone who HAS served with the 3/75 Ranger Regiment, it is my opinion that after what he did to besmirch the honor of a Regiment that he never belonged to in the first place, he deserves to have his name dragged through the mud. HE brought it upon HIMSELF. ====================================== >There are numerous other people >who talk about the terror that has >gone on in Iraq, including the use >white phosphorous ====================================== White Phosphorous rounds are used to generate what is known as "Quick Smoke". It's called "Quick Smoke" because WP rapidly generates thick white clouds of dense smoke and as such is useful for situations where you want to obscure the movement of friendly troops. For the record, I did not look that up on Wikipedia, it was part of my military Training as a Forward Observer. I am an expert of what is known as Indirect Fire Support and the ammunition used therein. So when I tell you that WP is a SMOKE GENERATOR and is neither a "Chemical Weapon" within the meaning of "WMD", nor is it even remotely related to Napalm. You do your cause no favor when you join the "Tinfoil Hat" brigade. -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-- regards c0ntex _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Throwaway1 () columbus rr com (Sep 11)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Gary E. Miller (Sep 11)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Paul Schmehl (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Paul Schmehl (Sep 12)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Denis Jedig (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this bkfsec (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 12)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is aptfor this Dave "No, not that one" Korn (Sep 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this b . hines (Sep 12)
- RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Throwaway1 () columbus rr com (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Nick FitzGerald (Sep 12)
- Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this bkfsec (Sep 13)