Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall.
From: Jeremy Bishop <requiem () praetor org>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:04:18 -0800
On Monday 13 March 2006 11:56, Matthijs van Otterdijk wrote:
except for that SSH uses RSA, which uses a public and private key. If the password is encrypted during the transfer to the site, and can only get decrypted there, then it can't possibly be sniffed with some computer inbetween, can it?
As Tim mentioned, the question isn't about the information getting to a site securely, it's about whether that site is the correct one and not an impostor. (I think the original poster was referring to SSL, not SSH, but that is really immaterial to the question.) Jeremy -- The universe does not have laws -- it has habits, and habits can be broken. -- BSD fortune file _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Simon Smith (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Matthijs van Otterdijk (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Tim (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Matthijs van Otterdijk (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Jeremy Bishop (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Simon Smith (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Jeremy Bishop (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Simon Smith (Mar 13)
- RE: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Lyal Collins (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Tim (Mar 13)
- RE: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Lyal Collins (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Jeremy Bishop (Mar 13)
- RE: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Lyal Collins (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Tim (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Tim (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Matthijs van Otterdijk (Mar 13)
- Re: HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall. Pavel Kankovsky (Mar 13)