Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: scanning
From: Marcos Agüero <maguero () s21sec com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:05:26 +0200
ad () heapoverflow com escribió:
That is why the definition of “damage” is so important. If there is no impairment to the integrity and availability of the network, then there is no crime.
So, It's seems that portscanning is not a crime but, what if I scan a network and sell/trade/lend the results to some guy that will cause that impairment to the network? Is it a crime to sell such information? Regards _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: scanning, (continued)
- Re: scanning Steve Kudlak (Jun 02)
- Re: scanning Alice Bryson (Jun 06)
- Re: scanning Neil Davis (Jun 14)
- RE: scanning David Alanis (Jun 01)
- Re: scanning Simon Smith (Jun 01)
- Re: scanning Nightfall Nightfall (Jun 01)
- Re: scanning Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 01)
- Re: scanning c0redump (Jun 02)
- Re: scanning GroundZero Security (Jun 02)
- Re: scanning ad () heapoverflow com (Jun 02)
- Re: scanning Marcos Agüero (Jun 02)
- Re: scanning Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 02)
- Re: scanning Simon Smith (Jun 01)
- Re: Fw: scanning Drew Masters (Jun 02)
- Re: Fw: scanning Lawrence Tang (Jun 02)
- Re: scanning GroundZero Security (Jun 12)