Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: infosecbofh
From: InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:26:29 -0800
On 1/6/06, Paul <pvnick () gmail com> wrote:
I hate to get involved, but AT LEAST HE'S TRYING. Even if his findings aren't going to cause a worldwide virus epidemic if the details are leaked or disclosed irresponsibly, they do contribute to the computer security industry and to the safety of the companies and customers affected. N3td3v (as well as all members of this list) should be appreciated and respected for their contributions. I say if you have nothing to give - not just advisories, but anything constructive - then please just enjoy the list passively. There is no reason to flame N3td3v for his work.
Yes, you are right to a point but he EVERBLOWS the impact of his so called work and expects everyone to bow down to him. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: infosecbofh, (continued)
- Re: infosecbofh c0ntex (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh foofus (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Stan Bubrouski (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Joe Average (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Stan Bubrouski (Jan 05)
- Message not available
- Re: infosecbofh Joe Average (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh John Cartwright (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh InfoSecBOFH (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Exibar (Jan 06)
- RE: infosecbofh Paul (Jan 07)
- Re: infosecbofh InfoSecBOFH (Jan 07)
- Re: infosecbofh fok yo (Jan 07)
- Re: infosecbofh michael tewner (Jan 05)
- Re: infosecbofh Steve Friedl (Jan 05)