Re: Third issue of the Zone-H Comics

[Andre Ludwig <andre.ludwig () gmail com>]

I figured it out..

N3td3v is trying to throw the SVR/GRU off his trail by acting like a
whitehat(e) while he concocts his diabolical plan for world domination
by releasing a multi vector aim/yahoo/msn 0day worm.

n3t don't worry your secret is safe with me!

"Opps i did it again"
http://tinyurl.com/b8cz5


n3td3v, just chill out a bit man you are coming off as the tinfoil type..

Dre


On 9/27/05, bkfsec <bkfsec () sdf lonestar org> wrote:
> J. Oquendo wrote:
>
> > To offer single sided right winged Hitlerish views of his personal Nirvana
> > of what security should be knowing little about it.
> Hahahaha... too true.
>
> > I recall when Attrition was in their "Heyday" and some issues they ran
> > into archiving defaced sites. I also take note of the dual edged sword
> > regarding displaying defacements. Take into account the actions (or
> > alleged actions) of John Vranesevich former kiddiot at AntiOnline now on
> > the UnEmploymentLine or wherever he is. It was alleged he ended up paying
> > his kiddiotic friends to deface sites so he could whore a story. This can
> > be corroborated by others who've been around for some time.
> Yep... and there have been scandals, as I recall, in the past where the
> news either angled for a position in a major disaster or actually
> orchestrated an attack in process... (anyone remember the issue with the
> L.A. riots and that person in the truck who got attacked?)
>
> But, should we then throw the baby out with the bathwater and ban the
> news?  Of course not...
>
> > Agencies in the US only take note when its to their benefit. I could track
> > down some of these idiots within minutes. Agencies only do so when it
> > suits their agendas. "Gee we need more money in our budget. I know, let's
> > go arrest little hax0r_X_f00_f00_f00 and implement a cybersecurity
> > department in our town!"
> Yep... well, virtually everything is a cost-benefit ratio in this
> world.   Aside from that, though, people would still deface sites
> regardless of whether there was an archive site up.  The primary motive
> for the defacement is often the initially hit of defacement itself.
>
> Frankly, what's a bigger issue than general defacement is when the
> kiddies put spyware or trojans on the defaced site....
>
> > Likely because his profile indicates he is trying to speak outside of his
> > experience range. He seems to be trying to fish for an angle... "If I say
> > this people with think I'm jolly krad!".
> Hahaha... I haven't seen the word "krad" used in a long time... it's
> funny, these kiddies try to act all |<-rad |<001 31334 but they lose the
> lingo in their focus on the idiotic lettering... it's like wannabes
> failing at being wannabes.
>
> > Of all the posts I've read concerning this matter he seems to be stuck on clueless trying to get a
> > shoe on which won't fit. Instead of waisting his time rambling on about
> > the political aspects of "security" he should be perhaps getting a clue on
> > it before sticking his foot down his throat.
> Agreed.
>
>              -bkfsec
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/