Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo
From: n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:28:36 +0100
On 10/14/05, James Tucker <jftucker () gmail com> wrote:
Sorry for the extremety of my blunt response, but I have two things to say: 1. How the fuck do YOU know any more than they do? Just because you obsess over the security factors around a company with which you have no affiliation does not put you in any greater authority to make statements like those you made there.
I heard it from the horses mouth. Yahoo don't acknowledge the same stats that IMLogic report on, and Yahoo say IMLogic's findings don't match that of Yahoo's own stats of their network. IMLogic can report on something and claim a worm is attacking, but when Yahoo's people go and look at their network, nothing is actually taking place! How many malicious messages do IMLogic record, before they decide theres a wide spread attack? Thats my question, because even with reports of worms on Yahoo, none have been seen by Yahoo or users.. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo n3td3v (Oct 14)
- Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo James Tucker (Oct 14)
- Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo Native.Code (Oct 14)
- Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo n3td3v (Oct 14)
- Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo Mary Landesman (Oct 14)
- Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo n3td3v (Oct 14)
- Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo Mary Landesman (Oct 14)
- Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo James Tucker (Oct 14)
- Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo n3td3v (Oct 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Oct 14)