Re: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo

[James Tucker <jftucker () gmail com>]

Sorry for the extremety of my blunt response, but I have two things to say:

1. How the fuck do YOU know any more than they do? Just because you
obsess over the security factors around a company with which you have
no affiliation does not put you in any greater authority to make
statements like those you made there.

2. I have absolutely no interest in the topic of Yahoo! as a general
view. Please keep your Yahoo orientated discussions on a Yahoo! lovers
list or similar. I will contend statistics I read on my own, and
decide my own level of trust. I certainly am not going to trust a
random person with the name "n3td3v" to provide me more accurate
statistics than a company devoted to the topic, as such, your
statement of observation (which is completely unjustified in your blog
entry, I might add) bears no relevance here. Moreover it can be best
classed as a political attack, which is actively discouraged by the
list charter.

Oh, and just FYI:
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/43364.html

Did you even check up on your own imagination before writing that, or
does it just flow straight out the fingers?

-Yet another donation to the WWWaste.

On 10/14/05, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
> http://n3td3v.blogspot.com/2005/10/imlogic-telling-porkies-about-yahoo.html
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/