Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: alert: the 111111 bug
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:11:58 -0500
--On Wednesday, July 06, 2005 14:31:17 -0500 Ron DuFresne <dufresne () winternet com> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Paul Schmehl wrote:--On July 4, 2005 12:03:02 AM +0100 lsi <stuart () cyberdelix net> wrote: > > For this customer 11/11/11 in the date field means, don't process > this record, which will obviously cause problems with legitimate > transactions on that date. > > I suspect using a new field to flag a state, instead of "special" > data, would have been more appropriate. > Not to worry. The 11th of November, 2011 is a Saturday. No one will be working that day. :-)
It was a joke. A *joke*. Did anyone *seriously* think I actually looked it *up*?
See the smiley???? Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- alert: the 111111 bug lsi (Jul 03)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Paul Schmehl (Jul 03)
- RE: alert: the 111111 bug Larry Seltzer (Jul 04)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Thomas Binder (Jul 04)
- Re: Re: alert: the 111111 bug Gabriel Moutinho (Jul 04)
- Re: Re: alert: the 111111 bug Paul Kurczaba (Jul 04)
- Re: Re: alert: the 111111 bug Ron DuFresne (Jul 06)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Ron DuFresne (Jul 06)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Paul Schmehl (Jul 06)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Steve Friedl (Jul 06)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Paul Schmehl (Jul 03)
- RE: alert: the 111111 bug Aditya Deshmukh (Jul 04)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 04)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug mbs (Jul 05)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Ron DuFresne (Jul 06)