Full Disclosure mailing list archives
alert: the 111111 bug
From: "lsi" <stuart () cyberdelix net>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:03:02 +0100
platforms affected: all distribution of threat: wide severity of threat: potentially serious leadtime: 6.3 years :) I noticed one of my customers using the "special" date of 11/11/11 in their database. I've since realised this practice might be quite widespread, and indeed warrants an alert than on or around the 11th of November 2011, some crazy things might happen, as folks' "special" dates collide with the real date of 11/11/11. For this customer 11/11/11 in the date field means, don't process this record, which will obviously cause problems with legitimate transactions on that date. I suspect using a new field to flag a state, instead of "special" data, would have been more appropriate. Apologies if this is old news for you. Stu --- Stuart Udall stuart at () cyberdelix dot net - http://www.cyberdelix.net/ --- * Origin: lsi: revolution through evolution (192:168/0.2) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- alert: the 111111 bug lsi (Jul 03)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Paul Schmehl (Jul 03)
- RE: alert: the 111111 bug Larry Seltzer (Jul 04)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Thomas Binder (Jul 04)
- Re: Re: alert: the 111111 bug Gabriel Moutinho (Jul 04)
- Re: Re: alert: the 111111 bug Paul Kurczaba (Jul 04)
- Re: Re: alert: the 111111 bug Ron DuFresne (Jul 06)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Ron DuFresne (Jul 06)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Paul Schmehl (Jul 06)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Steve Friedl (Jul 06)
- Re: alert: the 111111 bug Paul Schmehl (Jul 03)
- RE: alert: the 111111 bug Aditya Deshmukh (Jul 04)