Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Can we have...
From: Harry de Grote <rik.bobbaers () cc kuleuven ac be>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:13:59 +0100
Op Tuesday 25 January 2005 05:35, Etaoin Shrdlu sgreifde:
It is not at all a good idea. I don't read the list in a digest, and can't see why I should Might I suggest either using a gmail account to subscribe, or channeling it in as a newsgroup (ala Usenet), which will allow you to have what you want, and not inconvenience the rest of us. Anything not plaintext just doesn't belong on a security mailing list.
i second that (if it comes to voting) i wouldn't want any binaries being posted in here. just clear text (not even html!!) then again... that's just my 2 eurocents -- harry aka Rik Bobbaers K.U.Leuven - LUDIT -=- Tel: +32 485 52 71 50 Rik.Bobbaers () cc kuleuven ac be -=- http://harry.ulyssis.org "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former" --A. Einstein _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Can we have... Brian Anderson (Jan 24)
- Re: Can we have... Etaoin Shrdlu (Jan 24)
- Re: Can we have... Harry de Grote (Jan 25)
- Re: Can we have... Nick FitzGerald (Jan 25)
- Re: Can we have... Andrew Farmer (Jan 25)
- Re: Can we have... Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 24)
- Re: Can we have... Nick FitzGerald (Jan 24)
- Re: Can we have... Steve Kudlak (Jan 26)
- Re: Can we have... Jeremy Davis (Jan 26)
- Re: Can we have... Etaoin Shrdlu (Jan 24)