Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: why o why did NASA do this.
From: Adam Jones <ajones1 () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 09:17:38 -0500
The majority of the list had nothing more than alias $name $email Only small parts had any more specific contact information. The emails provided seem to all have been @nasa.gov anyways. (did not actually search for exceptions on this other than eyeballing it) Most likely any mail sent to these addresses would be filtered, especially spam. It probably is not much of a security risk as calling them to say "I am Brantly Hanks, Deputy Chief Engineer" would get a response of "Ok, give me your employeeID number to verify you". At the same time handing all of this out to everyone and anyone is just making that much more work for yourself. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- why o why did NASA do this. Deigo Dude (Oct 14)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. Geza Papp dr (Axelero) (Oct 15)
- RE: why o why did NASA do this. Chris DeVoney (Oct 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. Mike Diehl (Encrypted email preferred) (Oct 17)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. Andrew Smith (Oct 17)
- Re[2]: why o why did NASA do this. Geza Papp dr (Axelero) (Oct 17)
- Re: Re[2]: why o why did NASA do this. Andrew Smith (Oct 17)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. Adam Jones (Oct 17)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. Harry de Grote (Oct 18)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. Barry Fitzgerald (Oct 18)
- RE: why o why did NASA do this. Sean Crawford (Oct 18)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. Andrew Smith (Oct 17)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. KF_lists (Oct 18)
- Re[2]: why o why did NASA do this. Geza Papp dr (Axelero) (Oct 18)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. GuidoZ (Oct 19)