Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report
From: Dave Horsfall <dave () horsfall org>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:53:48 +1000 (EST)
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 lee.e.rian () census gov wrote:Lots 'o flame but no light. How about sharing your knowledge of why certain icmp traffic should be allowed and the risks associated with allowing that traffic?Just to name one: Path MTU discovery (RFC 1191)
To those who seek to block ICMP, I say: "Let them." I'm sure that a certain Mr. Charles Darwin will soon sort them out. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report Willem Koenings (Oct 16)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report Hugo van der Kooij (Oct 16)
- Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report Frank de Wit (Oct 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report lee . e . rian (Oct 16)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report Hugo van der Kooij (Oct 17)
- Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report Dave Horsfall (Oct 17)
- Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report Michal Zalewski (Oct 17)
- Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report Gary E. Miller (Oct 17)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic report Hugo van der Kooij (Oct 17)
- ICMP (was: daily internet traffic report) Frank de Wit (Oct 17)
- Re: ICMP (was: daily internet traffic report) James Edwards (Oct 17)
- Re: ICMP (was: daily internet traffic report) Cedric Blancher (Oct 17)
- Re: ICMP (was: daily internet traffic report) James Edwards (Oct 17)
- Re: ICMP (was: daily internet traffic report) Cedric Blancher (Oct 17)
- Re: ICMP (was: daily internet traffic report) james edwards (Oct 18)
- Re: ICMP (was: daily internet traffic report) Cedric Blancher (Oct 18)