Re: FW: Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment

[n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>]

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:44 +0000, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600, Todd Towles
> <toddtowles () brookshires com> wrote:
> > Well, it is given that posting to FD does give a site exposure (good and
> > bad). But I wouldn't say that FD was the cause of it..it was the illegal
> > activity that was the cause of it. We all know SCC does some underground
> > stuff and they post here each time they move. So...I wouldn't blame the
> > FD list for anything.
>
> I wouldn't use the word blame? I think its a good thing if
> Full-Disclosure is helping to catch online criminals. I don't know if
> you like malicious hackers and other criminals, but yeah.... I dislike
> them. I would do anything in my power to stop online crime, from
> scriptkiddie stuff, to sex stuff,spam,scams, fraud, terrorism and back
> again.
>
> I have no space for anyone thinking they are elite and all the other
> hacker scene crap. Its time to clamp down on the BS thats on the net.
>
> If I was in gov, I would shut a site down that looks remotely
> hax0rish, even if they've done nothing wrong. All these crews and
> hacker groups, fk them all. The net needs zero tollerence with online
> crime. Govs should have the authority to close anything done because
> they feel like it, without needing to prove shit.
>
> I would even close IRC channels. Hackphreak on undernet looks
> harmless, but fk that. Close it anyway, its time to get a tighter grip
> on things.
>
> Thanks,n3td3v

Same for zone-h.org, close the crap down.. f**k anything that looks
remotely hax0rish.

zero-tollerence!!

Thanks,n3td3v

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html