Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Wireless ISPs
From: Frank Knobbe <frank () knobbe us>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 15:32:03 -0500
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 13:33, D B wrote:
All transactions done via secure websites are secure,
No, they are not. It's just harder to intercept the data.
A wired internet connection limits the number of people who have access to this data simply by the nature of the internet putting it within acceptable risk.
Same can be said for wireless. (Except that the perimeter of the attack arena is defined by the wireless emissions instead of cable runs.)
It is legal according to US law to eavesdrop on wireless connections.
Maybe, INAL. But it is illegal to commit fraud with the data gathered by eavesdropping.
2. Encrypt all wireless transmissions at least making someone who gains access to this data prosecutable.
Uhm... someone that accesses and uses the data is already prosecutable.
Please direct all flames to /dev/null
Neat. Never heard that before... :) -Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Wireless ISPs D B (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Frank Knobbe (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs D B (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Frank Knobbe (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Scott Taylor (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Ron DuFresne (May 12)
- Re: Wireless ISPs D B (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Maarten (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Konstantin Gavrilenko (May 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Wireless ISPs D B (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Sean Milheim (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Jeff Workman (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Sean Milheim (May 11)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Frank Knobbe (May 11)