Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: morning_wood is really a blackhat
From: "Jos Osborne" <Jos () meltemi co uk>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 16:31:54 +0100
So what you're saying is more like Quality Control than censorship yes? Jos -----Original Message----- From: madsaxon [mailto:madsaxon () direcway com] Sent: 04 May 2004 16:27 To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat At 04:37 PM 5/4/2004 +0200, Christian Fromme wrote:
Censorship is not what we're looking for.
I think that's a debatable issue. It seems to me that some people on this list confuse "full disclosure of exploit-related code and advisories" with "unfettered posting of any shit that comes into a 14 year old's head at the moment." This list would be far more productive if we weren't constantly subjected to this barrage of pointless flaming and adolescent taunting. I trust at least one person will reply to this with something that illustrates my point. m5x _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: morning_wood is really a blackhat, (continued)
- Re: morning_wood is really a blackhat Marcin Owsiany (May 04)
- Re: morning_wood is really a blackhat John Sage (May 05)
- RE: morning_wood is really a blackhat Anonymous (Apr 30)
- RE: morning_wood is really a blackhat Paul Schmehl (Apr 30)
- Re: morning_wood is really a blackhat Willem Koenings (May 01)
- Re: morning_wood is really a blackhat Ray P (May 01)
- RE: morning_wood is really a blackhat Jimmy (May 01)
- morning_wood is really a blackhat Kajun Nujak (May 01)
- Re: morning_wood is really a blackhat Will Image (May 01)
- Re: morning_wood is really a blackhat Anonymous (May 03)
- RE: morning_wood is really a blackhat Jos Osborne (May 04)