Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Odd packet?
From: <full-disclosure () nym hush com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 06:41:31 -0700
Unlikely. If this were the case, the server would reply with RST, not RST, ACK. There's too little information to come to any conclusion at this point.
I have to correct myself, the server would reply with RST, ACK. Blaster.E (Skip Duckwall) looks like a more probable cause, but there is not enough information to be conclusive. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Odd packet?, (continued)
- Re: Odd packet? Mike Klinke (May 26)
- Message not available
- Re: Odd packet? Valentino Squilloni - Ouz (May 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Odd packet? Valentino Squilloni - Ouz (May 25)
- Re: Odd packet? Maarten (May 25)
- Message not available
- Re: Odd packet? Valentino Squilloni - Ouz (May 26)
- Re: Odd packet? Gregh (May 25)