Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Administrivia
From: Spiro Trikaliotis <trik-news () gmx de>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:46:43 +0100
Hello, I'm sorry since I think this is really OT on this list, but I only want to tell that little bit of information in the hope to stop this discussion. * On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 11:07:27PM -0600 Frank Knobbe wrote:
There is no absolute answer to this problem, like in much of security. It's a decision where each and everyone of us has to apply something special.... common sense.
Isn't that the reason why there is a Mail-Followup-To (MFT) header (http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html)? With this, the sender of a mail can decide if he wants a copy of the mail or not. If I want to get a copy of the mail in addition to the list, the header is set to the list and my address, if I don't want this, I set it to the list only. Mutt, my MUA, supports the notion of lists and subscribed list. On a non-subscribed list, I get a copy of any reply by setting MFT to myself, too, while I don't get a copy on subscribed lists. Why don't you all just let the user choose which way he wants to go? Thank you, Spiro. PS: Please honour my MFT. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?, (continued)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Jo Doe (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Random Letters (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? John . Airey (Mar 18)
- Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) madsaxon (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) madsaxon (Mar 18)
- Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia Jason (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Administrivia Frank Knobbe (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Administrivia Spiro Trikaliotis (Mar 19)
- Re: Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed) Cael Abal (Mar 19)
- Re: Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed) Bruno Wolff III (Mar 19)
- Re: Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed) Cael Abal (Mar 19)
- Re: Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed) Bruno Wolff III (Mar 19)
- Re: Re: Administrivia Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- NEVER open attachments VB (Mar 19)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- Re: Re: NEVER open attachments Blue Boar (Mar 19)
- Re: Re: NEVER open attachments Jim Richardson (Mar 19)
- Message not available
- Re: pgp passphrase Jim Richardson (Mar 20)