Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows
From: prj () po cwru edu (Paul Jarc)
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:46:14 -0500
Russell Nelson <nelson () crynwr com> wrote:
The work-around is not to set RELAYCLIENT. Since it's extremely unlikely that anybody is setting it in the first place, this bug should have no operational consequences.
Well, I don't think it's that uncommon in general - Bruce's relay-ctrl works by setting RELAYCLIENT - but you're probably right that hardly anybody uses RELAYCLIENT with QMTP. paul _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Georgi Guninski (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Daniel (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Bruno Wolff III (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Russell Nelson (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Paul Jarc (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Russell Nelson (Mar 03)