Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows
From: Daniel <deadbeat () sdf lonestar org>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:15:47 +0000 (UTC)
sooooooooooo close, i reckon you shuold get some that prize fund for finding it though ;) regards, deadbeat On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Georgi Guninski wrote:
-------------------------------------------------- [joro@sivokote tmp]$ ./qma-qmtpd.pl qmail-qmtpd buffer overflow. Copyright Georgi Guninski Cannot be used in vulnerability databases and similar stuff <in another terminal> ps awx 2080 pts/9 S 0:00 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qmtpd gdb attach 2080 cont <in first terminal hit enter> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0804b096 in alarm () --------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Georgi Guninski (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Daniel (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Bruno Wolff III (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Russell Nelson (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Paul Jarc (Mar 03)
- Re: Buffer overflow in qmail-qmtpd, yet still qmail much better than windows Russell Nelson (Mar 03)