Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: M$ - so what should they do?
From: Duncan Hill <dhill+fulldisc () cricalix net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:17:12 +0100
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 07:31, Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ] might have typed:
CON and NULL should stay but COM, AUX and LPT should go away. i had a server in which the script kiddes got into the ftp server and made a COM1 folder on ntfs. had been a pain in neck to rename that folder - had to use linux with ntfs support!
If memory serves, 2K+ has a POSIX toolset that lets you remove those privileged files. I know I tested it once, just to make sure it would work (though the server never got compromised). I don't think NT4 did though. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Todd Burroughs (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Todd Burroughs (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ] (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Duncan Hill (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Mohit Muthanna (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Ciro Spider-Man (Jun 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Eric Paynter (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? tcleary2 (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Eric Paynter (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Edge, Ronald D (Jun 22)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Edge, Ronald D (Jun 22)
- RE: RE: M$ - so what should they do? joe (Jun 22)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 21)