Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: M$ - so what should they do?

From: "Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ]" <aditya.deshmukh () online gateway technolabs net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:01:30 +0530

Also, the magic file names, like "CON" and "AUX" should go away.


No way!  Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to
create scripts and such at the command line?  Please tell me I'm not?


CON and NULL should stay but COM, AUX and LPT should go away. i had a server in which the script kiddes got into the 
ftp server and made a COM1 folder on ntfs. had been a pain in neck to rename that folder - had to use linux with ntfs 
support!

-aditya
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
éb½êÞvë"axZÞx÷«²ÚGb¶*'¡ó[kj¯ðÃæj)mªÿrÿ

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Current thread:

RE: M$ - so what should they do? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 21)
  - Re: M$ - so what should they do? Todd Burroughs (Jun 22)
    - Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ] (Jun 22)
  - Re: M$ - so what should they do? Duncan Hill (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Mohit Muthanna (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Ciro Spider-Man (Jun 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jun 21)
  - RE: M$ - so what should they do? Eric Paynter (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? tcleary2 (Jun 21)
  - Re: M$ - so what should they do? Eric Paynter (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Edge, Ronald D (Jun 22)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Edge, Ronald D (Jun 22)

(Thread continues...)