Full Disclosure mailing list archives
(no subject)
From: "roberta bragg" <freouwebbe () msn com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:18:56 -0600
Here's an opportunity to be heard by a number of security interested people, many of whom, don't subscribe to this list: Posted on behalf of Keith Ward: "Attention all Redmond haters! I'd like to issue a challenge to readers of this mailing list. I'm the editor of Security Watch, a newsletter produced by 101communications, http://www.mcpmag.com/newsletter/. Security Watch contains, among other items, a weekly commentary by Roberta Bragg. For the upcoming edition on Monday, I'd like you folks to tell me why you believe Microsoft just doesn't "get it" when it comes to security. Make your best pitch, giving specifics on a product or technology that you think is deserving of scorn; "Microsoft sucks, Bill Gates sucks, Steve Ballmer sucks" won't make the cut. Make your arguments sound, your reasoning solid. Please keep your submission between 300-1,000 words. Essays longer than 1,000 words will not be read. The following Wednesday, Roberta will give her own answer to the issue or issues you raise in a special edition of Security Watch. Oh yeah -- we'll also pay you $50 for your efforts. This isn't a Microsoft marketing ploy; neither my company nor I has any financial relationship with Microsoft. We're an independent media company, and my sole purpose in this is to generate healthy debate that will hopefully enlighten our readers. This is your chance to have more than 54,000 subscribers read your opinions. Tell them what you really think! Please submit your piece to me at keith.ward () mcpmag com, and Roberta at roberta.bragg () mcpmag com. Make sure both of us are recipients. And please do NOT send the essay as an attachment -- put it in the body of the e-mail. Also remember to let us know who you are, where you are and how to get hold of you, including a daytime phone number. If we can't contact you, we can't run your letter. Put "Security Watch Essay" in the Subject line, to make sure I don't delete it as spam. By submitting your comments, you give 101communications permission to publish them in Security Watch, along with your name. Thanks! Keith Keith Ward Editor, Security Watch""" _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: (no subject), whitehat tribute, phrack 64, (continued)
- RE: (no subject), whitehat tribute, phrack 64 daniel (Feb 07)
- (no subject) Jelmer (Feb 07)
- Re: (no subject) KF (Feb 07)
- Re: (no subject) Paul Schmehl (Feb 07)
- Re: (no subject) (use a subject fools!) KF (Feb 07)
- Re: (no subject) CHS (Feb 07)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- RE: (no subject) Aditya [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ] (Feb 08)
- Re: (no subject) KF (Feb 07)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: (no subject) KF (Feb 07)
- Re: (no subject) madsaxon (Feb 11)
- Re: (no subject) Berend-Jan Wever (Feb 11)
- Re: (no subject) Lee (Feb 11)
- Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Cael Abal (Feb 11)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) roberta bragg (Feb 11)