Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: more security people =3D less securityi
From: madsaxon <madsaxon () direcway com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:26:45 -0600
At 12:05 PM 2/5/2004 -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
I finished in twenty minutes, and passed. The last person walked out of there two hours into the exam. I signed an NDA that I don't remember the details of, so I'm loathe to disclose any specific details, but let's just say that I'd be surprised if my technophobic mother failed the exam.
I'm a CISSP because I made a bet I could walk in off the street and pass the exam. I did. I'd been doing it for a living for 15 years already at that point, though. Having said that, however, let me also state that if someone has CISSP or CISM or whatever, at least an employer knows they've been exposed to the concepts and terminology of the field. That's really all these certs are good for. They don't separate the wheat from the chaff, just the infosec chaff from the other chaff. m5x _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- more security people =3D less security Uncle Scrotora Balzac (Feb 03)
- Re: more security people = less security Michael Graham (Feb 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: more security people =3D less security Keith Pachulski (Feb 04)
- more security people =3D less security macmanus (Feb 04)
- Re: credibility (was 'more security people') Gregory A. Gilliss (Feb 04)
- Re: credibility (was 'more security people') rhetorical question (Feb 04)
- Re: more security people =3D less securityi Keith W. McCammon (Feb 04)
- Re: more security people =3D less securityi Damian Gerow (Feb 05)
- Re: more security people =3D less securityi madsaxon (Feb 05)
- Re: credibility (was 'more security people') Gregory A. Gilliss (Feb 04)