Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME
From: petard <petard () freeshell org>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:49:22 +0000
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 06:38:15PM -0800, Chris Adams wrote:
requests. There's no need to exchange keys, deal with key servers (how many clients won't automatically fetch the key I used with this message?) or explain a web of trust to your non-geek friends. Multiply
Umm... they don't need to automatically fetch the key you used with this message. You sent it. And they don't need to fetch the key that signed your key; it's included with their client distribution, they've manually gotten it, or they don't trust it and your sig didn't verify. No automatic fetching :-) regards, petard -- If your message really might be confidential, download my PGP key here: http://petard.freeshell.org/petard.asc and encrypt it. Otherwise, save bandwidth and lose the disclaimer. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME), (continued)
- Re: Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) Roy M. Silvernail (Feb 28)
- Re: Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) gadgeteer (Feb 28)
- Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) Byron Copeland (Feb 27)
- Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) Harry Hoffman (Feb 28)
- Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME petard (Feb 28)
- Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME martin f krafft (Feb 28)
- Re: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME petard (Feb 28)