Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME
From: martin f krafft <madduck () madduck net>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:32:12 +0100
also sprach gabriel rosenkoetter <gr () eclipsed net> [2004.02.28.2207 +0100]:
This isn't the right place for this conversation. Either Perry Metzger's cryptography list or cypherpunks (if you can still find an active node) would be the right place.
cypherpunks-request () al-qaeda net -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! will kill for oil!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME), (continued)
- Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) Troy Solo (Feb 27)
- Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) gadgeteer (Feb 27)
- Re: Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) Roy M. Silvernail (Feb 28)
- Re: Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) gadgeteer (Feb 28)
- Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) Byron Copeland (Feb 27)
- Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME) Harry Hoffman (Feb 28)
- Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME petard (Feb 28)
- Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME martin f krafft (Feb 28)
- Re: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME petard (Feb 28)