Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Knocking Microsoft
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:38:48 -0500
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:15:55 GMT, "James P. Saveker" <james () wetgoat net> said:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
I do not understand why people knock Microsoft so much in regard to security today. I regularly hear people talking about how many vulnerability's
Go back and re-read http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3485972.stm and ask yourself how serious a company can *really* be about security when the CTO of their Business Security unit is saying stuff like that.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Knocking Microsoft James P. Saveker (Feb 27)
- Re: Knocking Microsoft cdowns (Feb 27)
- RE: Knocking Microsoft joe (Feb 27)
- RE: Knocking Microsoft Dave Horsfall (Feb 27)
- RE: Knocking Microsoft joe (Feb 28)
- Re: Knocking Microsoft cdowns (Feb 27)
- RE: Knocking Microsoft joe (Feb 28)
- RE: Knocking Microsoft joe (Feb 27)
- Re: Knocking Microsoft cdowns (Feb 27)
- Re: Knocking Microsoft madsaxon (Feb 27)
- Re: [OT] Re: Knocking Microsoft Paul Schmehl (Feb 27)
- Re: [OT] Re: Knocking Microsoft martin f krafft (Feb 28)
- Re: [OT] Re: Knocking Microsoft Martin Mačok (Feb 28)
- Re: [OT] Re: Knocking Microsoft Rui Miguel Seabra (Feb 28)
- Re: [OT] Re: Knocking Microsoft bryce (Feb 28)
- secure downloading of patches (Re: Knocking Microsoft) Martin Mačok (Feb 28)
- Re: secure downloading of patches (Re: Knocking Microsoft) Cedric Blancher (Feb 29)