Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Blocking Music Sharing.


From: <srenna () vdbmusic com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:43:23 -0400

The company I was at before this was ridiculous, as bad as
it was for you.  The company had a massive MP3 server and
he basically had me cut off access to it to everyone except
for him...i should call the RIAA on his ass...

don't waste your time trying to enforce this man, you're
not liable for anything as you're an agent of the company,
so don't stress it.



On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:27:07 -0500
 "Rick Kingslan" <rkingsla () cox net> wrote:
"Bottom line is if management won't back the admin's
attempts to stop things
like this from the office, and the admin can't (for
whatever
reason) prevent it from a technical level, then the admin
has no place in
taking upon themself to embarrass or discipline
employees.  There's no place
for BOFH in today's corporate environment (IMHO at least)
and things like
this are unfortunately what gives seed to many admin
types I've either fired
or wanted to choke to death in the past.

Let management enforce the AUP in a professional manner,
taking the issue
seriously or not at all."

In my current situation - I can't enforce crap because
the biggest offender
is one of the VP's.  Seriously.  Currently, my hope is
that he's d/ling
enough to catch the attention of the RIAA.  With any
luck, he'll be served
and jailed in a week or so.... ;o)

Honestly, you make good points - and you are clearly
correct.  Trying to
enforce policy that is either not communicated, or badly
done - is stupid
and ill advised.  

However, if the policy IS communicated, sometimes you
only have to make an
example of one or two offenders - with your actions
strongly backed by
Executive Management.  Typically, if the rest of the
peasants see someone
strung up out in the main courtyard or the main lobby -
they get the point.

I'm really into good examples.  AUP works - examples
_with_ an AUP works
better.

-rtk

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf
Of Jonathan A.
Zdziarski
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:33 PM
To: Ron DuFresne
Cc: Cael Abal; full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Blocking Music Sharing.


I heartily disagree -- if an offense is considered
serious enough to 
warrant being prohibited in an org's Acceptable Use
Policy then 
there should be real punishment involved.  If an
offense isn't a big 
deal, then the AUP should be rewritten.


My belief is that proactive prevention should always be
tried before even
getting to this level; there should be differing levels
of severity in
punishment for those who violate the AUP, but I see no
reason not to block
the common ports as a first attempt.  Nearly every
company has a corporate
firewall (or at least should).  Many P2P sharing tools
are on obscure ports
that could easily be blocked.  Even a half-baked firewall
policy ought to be
able to prevent sharing.

A Wall of Shame just sets a bad precedent -- a user
could argue that 
the rules were ambiguous.  "What?  You can't fire me
for running 
that root exploit!  None of the other rules were ever
seriously 
enforced, our policy is a joke!"

Exposing employees instead of dealing with situations
privately is always
bad politics, and can be an easy way to kill morale (not
to mention bring on
a lawsuit by an embarrassed employee).  Enforce the AUP
in a private, civil
manner.  

Bottom line is if management won't back the admin's
attempts to stop things
like this from the office, and the admin can't (for
whatever
reason) prevent it from a technical level, then the admin
has no place in
taking upon themself to embarrass or discipline
employees.  There's no place
for BOFH in today's corporate environment (IMHO at least)
and things like
this are unfortunately what gives seed to many admin
types I've either fired
or wanted to choke to death in the past.

Let management enforce the AUP in a professional manner,
taking the issue
seriously or not at all.



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: